<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the house of camera egoists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chile.galangal.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chile.galangal.org</link>
	<description>a website by liza daly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:25:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Master and Margarita / Death in Venice by mark</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/the-master-and-margarita-death-in-venice/comment-page-1/#comment-24737</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/the-master-and-margarita-death-in-venice/#comment-24737</guid>
		<description>i just watched &#039;death in venice&#039;. it was bitterly horrible. painful. unfair. my god! if only it didnt promise so much i would have turned it off 20, 40, 80 minutes in. but it forced me to drink every last drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just watched &#8216;death in venice&#8217;. it was bitterly horrible. painful. unfair. my god! if only it didnt promise so much i would have turned it off 20, 40, 80 minutes in. but it forced me to drink every last drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorry, you don&#8217;t have a 200 IQ by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/sorry-you-dont-have-a-200-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-24268</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/?p=245#comment-24268</guid>
		<description>I love it when people continually spout misconceptions about what IQ really is. Usually it comes with people talking about &quot;oh well I had a high IQ and high test scores on the SAT&quot; implying a correlation or causation that simply is not there.

You won&#039;t be able to tell someone&#039;s IQ by talking with them, viewing their interactions, viewing test scores or achievements. The best I&#039;ve been able to understand IQ is it&#039;s more akin to horsepower. IQ means you can get from thought A to thought B quicker, or you might be able to juggle more abstract concepts, but doesn&#039;t imply you ever even made it to thought B.

Frankly I love IQ because it&#039;s an instant sign when someone touts their IQ as a badge of honor they&#039;re probably not the brightest or at least very arrogant. I like to laugh inside when people quote me their IQ&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when people continually spout misconceptions about what IQ really is. Usually it comes with people talking about &#8220;oh well I had a high IQ and high test scores on the SAT&#8221; implying a correlation or causation that simply is not there.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t be able to tell someone&#8217;s IQ by talking with them, viewing their interactions, viewing test scores or achievements. The best I&#8217;ve been able to understand IQ is it&#8217;s more akin to horsepower. IQ means you can get from thought A to thought B quicker, or you might be able to juggle more abstract concepts, but doesn&#8217;t imply you ever even made it to thought B.</p>
<p>Frankly I love IQ because it&#8217;s an instant sign when someone touts their IQ as a badge of honor they&#8217;re probably not the brightest or at least very arrogant. I like to laugh inside when people quote me their IQ&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gaebler Children&#8217;s Center by sean</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/the-gaebler-childrens-center/comment-page-1/#comment-24099</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/the-gaebler-childrens-center/#comment-24099</guid>
		<description>hey,just went there by chance didn&#039;t know what it was,want to back with camera and large flashlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey,just went there by chance didn&#8217;t know what it was,want to back with camera and large flashlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gaebler Children&#8217;s Center by shelly</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/the-gaebler-childrens-center/comment-page-1/#comment-23999</link>
		<dc:creator>shelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/the-gaebler-childrens-center/#comment-23999</guid>
		<description>Hey, i luv take pics of abandoned places, these days my friends are chickens and won&#039;t go w/me anymore, (ran into some homeless peeps in lawrence). So, wondering if you&#039;re up for any trips? I&#039;m thinking of going to gaebler&#039;s soon. Let me know. Thanks! Shelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, i luv take pics of abandoned places, these days my friends are chickens and won&#8217;t go w/me anymore, (ran into some homeless peeps in lawrence). So, wondering if you&#8217;re up for any trips? I&#8217;m thinking of going to gaebler&#8217;s soon. Let me know. Thanks! Shelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The City &amp; The City by China Miéville by Judi</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/the-city-the-city-by-china-mieville/comment-page-1/#comment-20320</link>
		<dc:creator>Judi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/?p=305#comment-20320</guid>
		<description>I really wanted to like Perdido Street Station, but I couldn&#039;t get through it -- it made me feel icky (maybe because one of the main characters is an insect). I&#039;ll give this one a try -- I like cross-genre, especially detective stories/sci-fi (Gun With Occasional Music does this really well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wanted to like Perdido Street Station, but I couldn&#8217;t get through it &#8212; it made me feel icky (maybe because one of the main characters is an insect). I&#8217;ll give this one a try &#8212; I like cross-genre, especially detective stories/sci-fi (Gun With Occasional Music does this really well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The City &amp; The City by China Miéville by Stacy</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/the-city-the-city-by-china-mieville/comment-page-1/#comment-20208</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/?p=305#comment-20208</guid>
		<description>I really liked it. And aside from the nifty &quot;is it SF/F or not&quot; thread through, I like that the ending didn&#039;t try to neatly wrap up the narrator&#039;s story, or move beyond &quot;there is a case, and here is how it was solved.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked it. And aside from the nifty &#8220;is it SF/F or not&#8221; thread through, I like that the ending didn&#8217;t try to neatly wrap up the narrator&#8217;s story, or move beyond &#8220;there is a case, and here is how it was solved.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorry, you don&#8217;t have a 200 IQ by Brady Yoon</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/sorry-you-dont-have-a-200-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-19917</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady Yoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/?p=245#comment-19917</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah...one more thing.  When women say that they look for confidence, sense of humor, that is the outward manifestation of intelligence.  Our world is set up so that intelligent people will find life &quot;easier,&quot; and hence life is a confidence builder (don&#039;t believe this?  everything in life requires thinking and reasoning at some level, it is because you&#039;re intelligent that you don&#039;t realize how much intelligence permeates every aspect of our world, as those with traumatic brain injury or stroke, Alzheimer&#039;s realize).  Sense of humor comes from seeing connections between seemingly unrelated things and connecting them in a new (and funny) way.  Why has intelligence developed?  Natural selection, yes.  But also sexual selection.

Intelligence was of huge survival value, but it has evolved to such a staggering extent, and that was probably due to sexual selection as well.

Do you know why women say that they don&#039;t like nerds?  It&#039;s because they are TRYING to sound smart.  Nerds are people who act according to a stereotypical &quot;smart&quot; person.  It&#039;s just like the person who tries to be funny but isn&#039;t.  The funny person is like the smart person and the &quot;nerd&quot; is like the person who is trying to be funny.  Trust me, intelligent people are well-adjusted, confident, are fun to be around.

I&#039;m not venting here.  I&#039;m trying to say that there are so many stereotypes of intelligent people that apply to the people who try to mimic intelligence rather than actually intelligent people.  Smart people don&#039;t try to come across as smart just like funny people don&#039;t try to be funny.  Mimicking intelligence is obviously a very valuable evolutionary strategy, simply because it works.  Think about what differentiates us from animals, what is our defining trait - intelligence.  People keep talking about emotional intelligence, social intelligence, analytical intelligence, etc.  Those things are PERSONALITY.  And I&#039;m not sure of this, but I&#039;ll make a big bet that &quot;personality&quot; arises as variations in the cerebral cortex, the center of intelligence.  Do animals have rich personalities?  No.

Intelligence is like knowing how to talk, or being able to see clearly in full color and depth perception, or being able to walk bipedally.  It&#039;s such a defining characteristic of Homo sapiens that it&#039;s easy to dismiss and downplay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah&#8230;one more thing.  When women say that they look for confidence, sense of humor, that is the outward manifestation of intelligence.  Our world is set up so that intelligent people will find life &#8220;easier,&#8221; and hence life is a confidence builder (don&#8217;t believe this?  everything in life requires thinking and reasoning at some level, it is because you&#8217;re intelligent that you don&#8217;t realize how much intelligence permeates every aspect of our world, as those with traumatic brain injury or stroke, Alzheimer&#8217;s realize).  Sense of humor comes from seeing connections between seemingly unrelated things and connecting them in a new (and funny) way.  Why has intelligence developed?  Natural selection, yes.  But also sexual selection.</p>
<p>Intelligence was of huge survival value, but it has evolved to such a staggering extent, and that was probably due to sexual selection as well.</p>
<p>Do you know why women say that they don&#8217;t like nerds?  It&#8217;s because they are TRYING to sound smart.  Nerds are people who act according to a stereotypical &#8220;smart&#8221; person.  It&#8217;s just like the person who tries to be funny but isn&#8217;t.  The funny person is like the smart person and the &#8220;nerd&#8221; is like the person who is trying to be funny.  Trust me, intelligent people are well-adjusted, confident, are fun to be around.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not venting here.  I&#8217;m trying to say that there are so many stereotypes of intelligent people that apply to the people who try to mimic intelligence rather than actually intelligent people.  Smart people don&#8217;t try to come across as smart just like funny people don&#8217;t try to be funny.  Mimicking intelligence is obviously a very valuable evolutionary strategy, simply because it works.  Think about what differentiates us from animals, what is our defining trait &#8211; intelligence.  People keep talking about emotional intelligence, social intelligence, analytical intelligence, etc.  Those things are PERSONALITY.  And I&#8217;m not sure of this, but I&#8217;ll make a big bet that &#8220;personality&#8221; arises as variations in the cerebral cortex, the center of intelligence.  Do animals have rich personalities?  No.</p>
<p>Intelligence is like knowing how to talk, or being able to see clearly in full color and depth perception, or being able to walk bipedally.  It&#8217;s such a defining characteristic of Homo sapiens that it&#8217;s easy to dismiss and downplay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorry, you don&#8217;t have a 200 IQ by Brady Yoon</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/sorry-you-dont-have-a-200-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-19915</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady Yoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/?p=245#comment-19915</guid>
		<description>Yeah, a 200 IQ is really unreasonable.  Pretty much, if someone says that they have an IQ of 145, and they really do, you won&#039;t be doubting them.  An IQ of 145 is like a height of 6&#039;7&quot;.  Everyone will soon find out that you&#039;re really intelligent.  So I guess I&#039;d revise your statement and say that if someone quotes a 145+ IQ and you look at him with a raised eyebrow, you&#039;re probably right.

I personally have an IQ that is high enough that I hit the ceiling at virtually every standardized test (SAT, GRE for example).  To me, the idea that these tests are actually &quot;standardized&quot; is hard to conceive because I&#039;ve always scored at 99th percentile, and I&#039;ve become very used to seeing that 99...I&#039;d say that my IQ is 155.

From personal experience, this is how you can tell if someone has an IQ of 155: Sense of humor, both depth and breadth of knowledge.  You&#039;ll be able to talk to him about anything and he&#039;ll hold an intelligent conversation and hold up his end of the argument.  I hate it when people say that intelligent people are bad conversationalists.  The difference between smart people and not so smart people in conversation: the smart person will recognize when the other person has said something intelligent, and that he needs to reassess his beliefs or rethink his position.  The not-intelligent person will not respond to your statement, but will simply act as if &quot;not listening.&quot;

A huge complaint that people have is people &quot;who don&#039;t listen.&quot;  Listening = understanding.  Understanding means intelligence.

If someone tells you that smart people are bad communicators, that person is not smart, and he&#039;s not a good communicator because he&#039;s spewing BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, a 200 IQ is really unreasonable.  Pretty much, if someone says that they have an IQ of 145, and they really do, you won&#8217;t be doubting them.  An IQ of 145 is like a height of 6&#8242;7&#8243;.  Everyone will soon find out that you&#8217;re really intelligent.  So I guess I&#8217;d revise your statement and say that if someone quotes a 145+ IQ and you look at him with a raised eyebrow, you&#8217;re probably right.</p>
<p>I personally have an IQ that is high enough that I hit the ceiling at virtually every standardized test (SAT, GRE for example).  To me, the idea that these tests are actually &#8220;standardized&#8221; is hard to conceive because I&#8217;ve always scored at 99th percentile, and I&#8217;ve become very used to seeing that 99&#8230;I&#8217;d say that my IQ is 155.</p>
<p>From personal experience, this is how you can tell if someone has an IQ of 155: Sense of humor, both depth and breadth of knowledge.  You&#8217;ll be able to talk to him about anything and he&#8217;ll hold an intelligent conversation and hold up his end of the argument.  I hate it when people say that intelligent people are bad conversationalists.  The difference between smart people and not so smart people in conversation: the smart person will recognize when the other person has said something intelligent, and that he needs to reassess his beliefs or rethink his position.  The not-intelligent person will not respond to your statement, but will simply act as if &#8220;not listening.&#8221;</p>
<p>A huge complaint that people have is people &#8220;who don&#8217;t listen.&#8221;  Listening = understanding.  Understanding means intelligence.</p>
<p>If someone tells you that smart people are bad communicators, that person is not smart, and he&#8217;s not a good communicator because he&#8217;s spewing BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Netherland by Joseph O&#8217;Neill by Alex</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/netherland-by-joseph-oneill/comment-page-1/#comment-19790</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/?p=298#comment-19790</guid>
		<description>I am a very premium expat, sired in Europe and living in New York (Brighton Beach to be unequivocal), and I find the dulcet tone of the hero in this story to be maximally spurious. No one would converse in such a dubious idiom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a very premium expat, sired in Europe and living in New York (Brighton Beach to be unequivocal), and I find the dulcet tone of the hero in this story to be maximally spurious. No one would converse in such a dubious idiom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jittery waiter by Gimcrack&#8217;d: Dross: Why isn&#8217;t there innovation in IF anymore?</title>
		<link>http://chile.galangal.org/jittery-waiter/comment-page-1/#comment-16911</link>
		<dc:creator>Gimcrack&#8217;d: Dross: Why isn&#8217;t there innovation in IF anymore?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chile.galangal.org/jittery-waiter/#comment-16911</guid>
		<description>[...] to kids these days. Either way, the community seems to me (admittedly, an outside observer) smaller and smaller, with an accordingly smaller pool of inspiration to draw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to kids these days. Either way, the community seems to me (admittedly, an outside observer) smaller and smaller, with an accordingly smaller pool of inspiration to draw [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
